Connect with us


Certain devices can mitigate the risks of Type 1 diabetes — but only for those who can afford them





Last month, as part of its “Implant Files” package, CBC News documented reports of injury and death due to insulin pumps. Millions of people with Type 1 diabetes around the world use the pumps to help manage their blood sugar levels as an alternative to multiple daily injections.

The investigation concluded that “for some people with diabetes, depending on their level of training and knowledge, the popular device might not be the safest way to manage their blood glucose levels.”

Readers with little background knowledge about Type 1 diabetes or insulin pumps might have walked away from the investigation with the impression that the pump is an inherently dangerous device: one that could cause insulin overdose or even death. But here is the far more important fact: Type 1 diabetes is dangerous. Insulin is dangerous. We need to focus on — and ideally, petition for coverage for — the mechanisms that mitigate that risk.  

A life-changing diagnosis

At age 11, my daughter started to exhibit symptoms of Type 1 diabetes: she developed an unquenchable thirst, lost weight at an alarming rate, was tired often and her vision started to blur. Immediately, we were forced into a scary new world. The idea of having to inject your child with insulin multiple times every day is unnerving, but that’s what our daughter needed to survive. Insulin is a hormone that no one can live without. Thank your functioning pancreas if you don’t have to get yours at the pharmacy.

We were shocked and terrified to learn that Type 1 diabetes is the only chronic, life threatening disease where the dosing decisions of a potentially lethal hormone are left in the hands of the patient alone. Without the training and education we received and continue to receive from the Charles H. Best Diabetes Centre in Whitby, Ont., we would not have made it through that first year. They helped us determine insulin to carb ratios and basal rates that our daughter’s body needed. 

Our daughter did insulin injections for 10 months before she decided she wanted to try the pump. We went through the training and never looked back. Pumping worked for us because we’re diligent with testing, closely monitor blood sugars and count carbs. We routinely check the pump to make sure it’s functioning properly. After all, it is a machine. Machines can malfunction.  

The pump works for our daughter because of the convenience factor. She doesn’t want to pull out syringes, prime them and do a complicated math equation before injecting herself with what she hopes will be the right amount of insulin for the carbs she is consuming. In a crowded high school cafeteria full of distractions, that could easily lead to a dosing error.

Since a CGM sensor is always on the body, it can continuously track levels and alert patients as their levels are fluctuating. (Jackie McKay/CBC )

But pumping also works for us because we rely on another device: a continuous glucose monitor, or CGM. Being a Type 1 diabetic has traditionally meant constantly pricking your finger to test your blood sugar levels. Four months into diagnosis, I thought there must be some sort of technology that would mean a better way. So I started Googling and stumbled upon the CGM: a device that would allow us to sleep at night without fear of missing an episode of hypoglycemia — severe low blood sugar — that could prevent our daughter from waking up the next day. 

The device provides blood glucose readings every five minutes by reading interstitial fluid through a sensor and transmitter on the body. It sends readings via Bluetooth to phones or receivers. Since a CGM sensor is always on the body, it can continuously track levels and alert patients as their levels are fluctuating, instead of testing after the fact.  

Out-of-pocket costs

Thankfully, if our daughter were to dose herself incorrectly, she would recognize it on her CGM and intervene before it got too serious. She is one of the lucky ones. This device is so important to us that we pay the $3,000 per year cost out of pocket, and we would sacrifice just about anything to keep it. Some families can’t afford to do that, so they fundraise.

The cost of an insulin pump is covered by Ontario’s provincial government, but supplies for it often exceed the $2,400 per year the government provides. There is no coverage, on the other hand, for CGMs. Other provinces — such as Quebec and the Yukon —  have started exploring coverage options. But most Type 1 patients and their families in Canada are left to cover the costs themselves.

Health Quality Ontario interviewed us and other families affected by Type 1 diabetes back in 2017, and it recommended that CGMs be funded for certain people, including those who don’t feel the symptoms of, or can’t communicate about, episodes of low blood sugar. Unfortunately, we haven’t had much of a response from the province.

CGMs provide incredible insight into what direction your blood sugar is heading and how quickly. This information is crucial in the management of Type 1 diabetes. Whether you miscalculated your insulin dose, or it’s just one of those crazy roller coaster days that all Type 1s have, the CGM warns you and gives you the chance to respond quickly to a plummeting or skyrocketing blood sugar.

Type 1 diabetes is a dangerous disease, and there is no cure or way to prevent it. Self-administering a potentially lethal hormone is always going to be dangerous, whether it’s through daily injections — which can mean human error — or through insulin pumps — which can mean technological malfunction. The focus should be on ways we can lessen the risk that comes with self-administering insulin. And the tools should be available to everyone, regardless of financial constraints.

This column is part of CBC’s Opinion section. For more information about this section, please read our FAQ.


Source link

قالب وردپرس

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Bill Gates: Third Shot May Be Needed to Combat Coronavirus Variants





With more than 40 million Americans having received at least the first dose of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine, a third dose may be needed to prevent the spread of new variants of the disease, Bill Gates told CBS News Tuesday.

Gates’ comments come amid growing concern that the current vaccines are not effective against the more contagious Brazilian and South African variants.

Pfizer and Moderna have stated that their vaccines are 95% and 99% effective, respectively, against the initial strain of COVID. However, some scientists have questioned those statements. Additionally, the World Health Organization and vaccine companies have conceded that the vaccines do not prevent people from being infected with COVID or from transmitting it, but are only effective at reducing symptoms.

Gates told CBS Evening News:

“The discussion now is do we just need to get a super high coverage of the current vaccine, or do we need a third dose that’s just the same, or do we need a modified vaccine?”

U.S. vaccine companies are looking at making modifications, which Gates refers to as “tuning.”

People who have had two shots may need to get a third shot and people who have not yet been vaccinated would need the modified vaccine, explained Gates. When asked whether the coronavirus vaccine would be similar to the flu vaccine, which requires yearly boosters, Gates couldn’t rule that out. Until the virus is eradicated from all humans, Gates said, additional shots may be needed in the future.

AstraZeneca in particular has a challenge with the variant,” Gates explained. “And the other two, Johnson & Johnson and Novavax, are slightly less effective, but still effective enough that we absolutely should get them out as fast as we can while we study this idea of tuning the vaccine.”

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is funding the studies being conducted in Brazil and South Africa, CBS News said. The foundation has also invested in the AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson and the Novavax vaccines, which are being tested against new variants. Once the AstraZeneca vaccine is approved, the Global Alliance for Vaccine Initiative or GAVI, founded by Gates, will distribute it globally.

“Gates continues to move the goalposts,” said Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief legal counsel of Children’s Health Defense. “Meanwhile the strategies he and others have promoted are obliterating the global economy, demolishing the middle class, making the rich richer and censoring vaccine safety advocates, like me.”

Kennedy said that the exclusive focus on vaccines has prevented the kind of progress required to actually address and recover from the pandemic:

“From the pandemic’s outset, clear-headed people familiar with the challenges inherent in the vaccine model have understood that the path out of crisis would require multiple steps. Those steps would need to include the development and/or identification of therapeutic drugs, the sharing of information among doctors to hone improved treatment models that reduce infection mortality rates below those for flu, and the kind of broad-spectrum long-term herd immunity that protects against mutant strains and that only derives from natural infection.”

Instead, Gates and vaccine makers are proposing a lifetime of boosters, supporting insufficient testing to determine safety and failing to address the inadequate monitoring of vaccine injuries, Kennedy said.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Continue Reading


Young nurse suffers from hemorrhage and brain swelling after second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine





(Natural News) A 28-year-old healthcare worker from the Swedish American Hospital, in Beloit, Wisconsin was recently admitted to the ICU just five days after receiving a second dose of Pfizer’s experimental mRNA vaccine. The previously healthy young woman was pronounced brain dead after cerebral angiography confirmed a severe hemorrhage stroke in her brain stem.

Her family members confirmed that she was “breaking out in rashes” after the vaccine. She also suffered from sudden migraine headaches, and got “sick” after taking the second dose of the vaccine. At the very end, she lost the ability to speak and went unconscious. The migraines, nausea, and loss of speech were all symptoms of a brain bleed and brain swelling, something her family did not understand at the time, and something nobody would expect after vaccination.

While on life support, neurologists used angiography to image the damage inside the brain. They found a subarachnoid hemorrhage, whereas a bulging blood vessel burst in the brain, bleeding out in the space between the brain and the tissue covering the brain. The ensuing swelling cut off oxygen to the brain and caused brain death. On February 10, 2021, Sarah reportedly had “no brain activity.” Some of the woman’s organs are now being procured, so they can be donated to other people around the world.

Doctors warn FDA about COVID vaccines causing autoimmune attacks in the heart and brain

Experimental COVID-19 vaccines may cause inflammation along the cardiovascular system, leading to heart attack and/or stroke. This serious issue was brought forth to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by Dr. J. Patrick Whelan, M.D., Ph.D. and further confirmed by cardiothoracic surgeon, Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, M.D., Ph.D. The two doctors warned that a recently-infected patient who is subject to COVID-19 vaccination is likely to suffer from autoimmune attacks along the ACE-2 receptors present in the heart, and in the microvasculature of the brain, liver and kidney. If viral antigens are present in the tissues of recipients at the time of vaccination, the vaccine-augmented immune response will turn the immune system against those tissues, causing inflammation that can lead to blood clot formation.

This severe adverse event is likely cause of death for the elderly who are vaccinated despite recently being infected. There is no adequate screening process to ensure that this autoimmune attack doesn’t occur. The elderly are not the only people vulnerable to vaccine injury and death. Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine could be the main cause behind the sudden death of Sarah Sickles, a 28-year-old nurse from Wisconsin. The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System has captured five permanent disabilities in Wisconsin, 58 ER visits, and eleven deaths in just one month. This is the first case in Wisconsin of someone under 44 years of age suffering from severe COVID-19 vaccine side effects and death. There are now more than 1,170 deaths recorded in the U.S. related to the experimental mRNA vaccines, a reality that the FDA and CDC continue to ignore.

Continue Reading


Powering hypersonic weapons: US armed forces eyeing dangerous 5G tech





(Natural News) Much of the conversation surrounding the benefits of 5G is geared toward the consumer side of the technology. People will be able to download videos at lightning speed and will be more connected than ever, proponents claim, although there are serious questions regarding its safety. However, some of the most important 5G applications are not civil at all – the technology will be used extensively in the military domain.

Some of its military uses are outlined in the Defense Applications of 5G Network Technology report, which was published by the Defense Science Board. This federal committee gives scientific advice to the Pentagon. Their report states: “The emergence of 5G technology, now commercially available, offers the Department of Defense the opportunity to take advantage, at minimal cost, of the benefits of this system for its own operational requirements.”

The 5G commercial network that is being built by private companies right now can be used by the American military for a much lower cost than if the network had been set up exclusively for military purposes.

Military experts expect the 5G system to play a pivotal role in using hypersonic weapons. For example, it can be used for new missiles that bear nuclear warheads and travel at speeds superior to Mach 5. These hypersonic weapons, which travel at five times the speed of sound and move a mile per second, will be flying at high altitudes on unpredictable flight paths, making them as hard to guide as they will be to intercept.

Huge quantities of data need to be gathered and transmitted in a very short period in order to maneuver these warheads on variable trajectories and allow them to change direction in milliseconds to avoid interceptor missiles.

5G for defense

This type of technology is also needed to activate defenses should we be attacked by a weapon of this type; 5G automatic systems could theoretically handle decisions that humans won’t have enough time to make on their own. Military bases and even cities will have less than a minute to react to incoming hypersonic missiles, and 5G will make it easier to process real time data on trajectories for decision-making.

There are also important uses of this technology in combat. 5G’s ability to simultaneously link millions of transceivers will undoubtedly facilitate communication among military personnel and allow them to transmit photos, maps and other vital information about operations in progress at dizzying speeds to improve situational awareness.

The military can also take advantage of the high-frequency and short-wavelength millimeter wave spectrum used by 5G. Its short range means that it is well suited for smart military bases and command posts because the signal will not propagate too far, making it less likely that enemies will be able to detect it.

When it comes to special forces and secret services, the benefits of 5G are numerous. Its speed and connectivity will allow espionage systems to reach unprecedented levels of efficiency. It will also make drones more dangerous by allowing them to identify and target people using facial recognition and other methods.

Like all technology, 5G will also make us highly vulnerable. The network itself could become an attractive target for cyber-attacks and other acts of war being carried out with cutting-edge weaponry. In fact, the 5G network is already viewed as critical infrastructure and is being carefully protected before it is even fully built.

While the focus on 5G’s dangers to human health and the environment is absolutely warranted, it is also important not to lose sight of the military implications of 5G. After all, it is not just the United States that is developing this technology for military purposes; our enemies, like China and other countries, are also making great strides in this realm.

Continue Reading