Connect with us

Health

Moving to N.L. from another province? You might not get health care

Editor

Published

on

[ad_1]

Charlotte Morton might have been raised on another coast, but she married a Newfoundlander, works in St. John’s and owns a house in Airport Heights.

She has no plans to move; Newfoundland is home for Morton in every sense of the word.

Except, that is, for one: Medical Care Plan policy won’t consider Morton a resident, she says, leaving her struggling to access basic care.

“I work here, I pay taxes here, my children go to school here,” Morton told CBC News. “I couldn’t be more entrenched into the local community in terms of where my social network is, but because I was living in B.C. before I came here, I’m not considered a resident.”

Under the Canada Health Act, “home” provinces must cover a Canadian resident who settles elsewhere in the country for three months.

I work here, I pay taxes here, my children go to school here.– Charlotte Morton

After that, it’s up to the new province — in this case, Newfoundland and Labrador — to take over and start shelling out for services.

But MCP told Morton she’s ineligible for coverage as long as she attends school, despite Morton making it clear that she does not intend to return to British Columbia after her studies.

Angelica Lauzon and her partner, Stewart Walker, have been refused health-care coverage in Newfoundland and Labrador, despite having moved to the province permanently. (Malone Mullin/CBC)

Morton, an instructor and PhD student at Memorial University, said she has requested coverage four times since 2012 but was refused on each occasion, leaving her on the hook for specialist bills until B.C. reimburses her.

She can’t afford that, she said. Instead, she’s stuck waiting for B.C. to approve those expenses, including surgical gallstone removal.

But B.C. hasn’t yet agreed to cover the procedure in Newfoundland, meaning Morton would need to spend time and money to travel across the country.

So for now, she waits, hoping her condition doesn’t cause sepsis and still fighting to have the extraction performed in Newfoundland without facing hefty up-front costs.

The bureaucratic tangle has left Morton neglecting her health.

“I’ve put off dealing with things,” she said.

Regulatory hole

Under the province’s  Medical Care and Hospital Insurance Act, a “resident” of a province is someone who simply “makes his or her home” in Newfoundland and Labrador. But it doesn’t include students or their dependents, as long as they’re covered by their home province.

An MCP official told CBC News that as policy, the province does not accept any application that references studying in Newfoundland.

Yet some provinces, including British Columbia, won’t cover students who leave and don’t intend to return after graduation.

The resulting regulatory gap left Angelica Lauzon and her partner, Stewart Walker, without any coverage at all earlier this month.

Lauzon said she made all the necessary calls to each health authority before moving to St. John’s from Victoria in September. But when she tried to submit her MCP application, she was told that because her partner was in school, she wouldn’t be eligible either.

Health Minister John Haggie says he wants to open up eligibility for MCP coverage. (Katie Breen/CBC)

Lauzon explained they had moved to Newfoundland for good and asked to fill out the form again. At that point, she was told they would be charged with fraud if they attempted to reapply while Walker remained a student.

Their home province, also B.C., issued a letter to the couple stating they wouldn’t be protected by B.C. insurance since they did not intend to return.

Their three-month grace period of B.C. coverage ended Nov. 30, so they were left without coverage for five days before B.C. relented and offered to reinstate their insurance.

A B.C. official told Lauzon over the phone they would have to “bend the rules” to cover them, a statement that made her uneasy, she said.

I just want that comfort of being able to call up a family doctor and make an appointment.–  Angelica Lauzon

When she tried MCP again, an official told Lauzon that Canadians are sometimes left without coverage due to clashing rules between provinces. The official said MCP had dealt with three similar cases in a week, two of them from Ontario.

Health Canada confirmed in a statement there are sometimes disputes between provinces that, in “rare” instances, lead to Canadians falling through the cracks. In those cases, the health authority would step in and mediate the disagreement, the agency said.

Although it didn’t get to that point for Lauzon and Walker, the ordeal has left her anxious and frustrated — and “kind of paying double,” she says, for medical services in B.C. while her taxes go to N.L.

“I’m speechless, really,” Lauzon said. “I just want that comfort of being able to call up a family doctor and make an appointment.”

‘That’s crazy,’ says health minister

Minister of Health and Community Services John Haggie said he wasn’t aware of Newfoundland and Labrador residents being denied health coverage and there had been no direction from his department to restrict eligibility.

“In actual fact, we’ve been looking at opening up eligibility requirements for people coming in from outside as part of our immigration and economic stimulus approach, so that we can encourage people to come here,” Haggie said.

“If you’ve got a Canadian citizen who wants to move to Newfoundland and Labrador and can’t get coverage, that’s crazy. We’re open for business.”

Morton has no intention of moving back to B.C., but may need to have her gall bladder removed there. (Sherry Vivian/CBC)

Haggie encouraged anyone falling through the cracks to call his office.

The health department said it does not track rejected MCP applications.

Pressure to leave

Thanks to the “portability clause” in the Canada Health Act that allows Canadians to obtain insured services between provinces, an out-of-province health card should grant someone access to medically necessary health services in N.L.

But Morton, meanwhile, said that’s not her experience; she knows first-hand the system doesn’t work as smoothly as it’s supposed to. Until her gallstones cause a medical emergency, she’s left without any viable means of having them removed.

For Morton, the way MCP handles students seems outdated, a relic of a time when people moved to another province for school and returned home to family. And as long as it remains in place, she said, students might think twice about sticking around.

“By maintaining these sort of policies, we give people the impression they’re expected to just be temporary,” Morton said.

“I don’t think it’s unusual, or something we should be discouraging, that once people start school they decide to stay here.… Ultimately, if I have to look after myself, they’re putting undue pressure on me to leave.”

Read more from CBC Newfoundland and Labrador

[ad_2]

Source link

قالب وردپرس

Health

Bill Gates: Third Shot May Be Needed to Combat Coronavirus Variants

Editor

Published

on

By

With more than 40 million Americans having received at least the first dose of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine, a third dose may be needed to prevent the spread of new variants of the disease, Bill Gates told CBS News Tuesday.

Gates’ comments come amid growing concern that the current vaccines are not effective against the more contagious Brazilian and South African variants.

Pfizer and Moderna have stated that their vaccines are 95% and 99% effective, respectively, against the initial strain of COVID. However, some scientists have questioned those statements. Additionally, the World Health Organization and vaccine companies have conceded that the vaccines do not prevent people from being infected with COVID or from transmitting it, but are only effective at reducing symptoms.

Gates told CBS Evening News:

“The discussion now is do we just need to get a super high coverage of the current vaccine, or do we need a third dose that’s just the same, or do we need a modified vaccine?”

U.S. vaccine companies are looking at making modifications, which Gates refers to as “tuning.”

People who have had two shots may need to get a third shot and people who have not yet been vaccinated would need the modified vaccine, explained Gates. When asked whether the coronavirus vaccine would be similar to the flu vaccine, which requires yearly boosters, Gates couldn’t rule that out. Until the virus is eradicated from all humans, Gates said, additional shots may be needed in the future.

AstraZeneca in particular has a challenge with the variant,” Gates explained. “And the other two, Johnson & Johnson and Novavax, are slightly less effective, but still effective enough that we absolutely should get them out as fast as we can while we study this idea of tuning the vaccine.”

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is funding the studies being conducted in Brazil and South Africa, CBS News said. The foundation has also invested in the AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson and the Novavax vaccines, which are being tested against new variants. Once the AstraZeneca vaccine is approved, the Global Alliance for Vaccine Initiative or GAVI, founded by Gates, will distribute it globally.

“Gates continues to move the goalposts,” said Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief legal counsel of Children’s Health Defense. “Meanwhile the strategies he and others have promoted are obliterating the global economy, demolishing the middle class, making the rich richer and censoring vaccine safety advocates, like me.”

Kennedy said that the exclusive focus on vaccines has prevented the kind of progress required to actually address and recover from the pandemic:

“From the pandemic’s outset, clear-headed people familiar with the challenges inherent in the vaccine model have understood that the path out of crisis would require multiple steps. Those steps would need to include the development and/or identification of therapeutic drugs, the sharing of information among doctors to hone improved treatment models that reduce infection mortality rates below those for flu, and the kind of broad-spectrum long-term herd immunity that protects against mutant strains and that only derives from natural infection.”

Instead, Gates and vaccine makers are proposing a lifetime of boosters, supporting insufficient testing to determine safety and failing to address the inadequate monitoring of vaccine injuries, Kennedy said.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Continue Reading

Health

Young nurse suffers from hemorrhage and brain swelling after second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine

Editor

Published

on

By

(Natural News) A 28-year-old healthcare worker from the Swedish American Hospital, in Beloit, Wisconsin was recently admitted to the ICU just five days after receiving a second dose of Pfizer’s experimental mRNA vaccine. The previously healthy young woman was pronounced brain dead after cerebral angiography confirmed a severe hemorrhage stroke in her brain stem.

Her family members confirmed that she was “breaking out in rashes” after the vaccine. She also suffered from sudden migraine headaches, and got “sick” after taking the second dose of the vaccine. At the very end, she lost the ability to speak and went unconscious. The migraines, nausea, and loss of speech were all symptoms of a brain bleed and brain swelling, something her family did not understand at the time, and something nobody would expect after vaccination.

While on life support, neurologists used angiography to image the damage inside the brain. They found a subarachnoid hemorrhage, whereas a bulging blood vessel burst in the brain, bleeding out in the space between the brain and the tissue covering the brain. The ensuing swelling cut off oxygen to the brain and caused brain death. On February 10, 2021, Sarah reportedly had “no brain activity.” Some of the woman’s organs are now being procured, so they can be donated to other people around the world.

Doctors warn FDA about COVID vaccines causing autoimmune attacks in the heart and brain

Experimental COVID-19 vaccines may cause inflammation along the cardiovascular system, leading to heart attack and/or stroke. This serious issue was brought forth to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by Dr. J. Patrick Whelan, M.D., Ph.D. and further confirmed by cardiothoracic surgeon, Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, M.D., Ph.D. The two doctors warned that a recently-infected patient who is subject to COVID-19 vaccination is likely to suffer from autoimmune attacks along the ACE-2 receptors present in the heart, and in the microvasculature of the brain, liver and kidney. If viral antigens are present in the tissues of recipients at the time of vaccination, the vaccine-augmented immune response will turn the immune system against those tissues, causing inflammation that can lead to blood clot formation.

This severe adverse event is likely cause of death for the elderly who are vaccinated despite recently being infected. There is no adequate screening process to ensure that this autoimmune attack doesn’t occur. The elderly are not the only people vulnerable to vaccine injury and death. Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine could be the main cause behind the sudden death of Sarah Sickles, a 28-year-old nurse from Wisconsin. The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System has captured five permanent disabilities in Wisconsin, 58 ER visits, and eleven deaths in just one month. This is the first case in Wisconsin of someone under 44 years of age suffering from severe COVID-19 vaccine side effects and death. There are now more than 1,170 deaths recorded in the U.S. related to the experimental mRNA vaccines, a reality that the FDA and CDC continue to ignore.

Continue Reading

Health

Powering hypersonic weapons: US armed forces eyeing dangerous 5G tech

Editor

Published

on

By

(Natural News) Much of the conversation surrounding the benefits of 5G is geared toward the consumer side of the technology. People will be able to download videos at lightning speed and will be more connected than ever, proponents claim, although there are serious questions regarding its safety. However, some of the most important 5G applications are not civil at all – the technology will be used extensively in the military domain.

Some of its military uses are outlined in the Defense Applications of 5G Network Technology report, which was published by the Defense Science Board. This federal committee gives scientific advice to the Pentagon. Their report states: “The emergence of 5G technology, now commercially available, offers the Department of Defense the opportunity to take advantage, at minimal cost, of the benefits of this system for its own operational requirements.”

The 5G commercial network that is being built by private companies right now can be used by the American military for a much lower cost than if the network had been set up exclusively for military purposes.

Military experts expect the 5G system to play a pivotal role in using hypersonic weapons. For example, it can be used for new missiles that bear nuclear warheads and travel at speeds superior to Mach 5. These hypersonic weapons, which travel at five times the speed of sound and move a mile per second, will be flying at high altitudes on unpredictable flight paths, making them as hard to guide as they will be to intercept.

Huge quantities of data need to be gathered and transmitted in a very short period in order to maneuver these warheads on variable trajectories and allow them to change direction in milliseconds to avoid interceptor missiles.

5G for defense

This type of technology is also needed to activate defenses should we be attacked by a weapon of this type; 5G automatic systems could theoretically handle decisions that humans won’t have enough time to make on their own. Military bases and even cities will have less than a minute to react to incoming hypersonic missiles, and 5G will make it easier to process real time data on trajectories for decision-making.

There are also important uses of this technology in combat. 5G’s ability to simultaneously link millions of transceivers will undoubtedly facilitate communication among military personnel and allow them to transmit photos, maps and other vital information about operations in progress at dizzying speeds to improve situational awareness.

The military can also take advantage of the high-frequency and short-wavelength millimeter wave spectrum used by 5G. Its short range means that it is well suited for smart military bases and command posts because the signal will not propagate too far, making it less likely that enemies will be able to detect it.

When it comes to special forces and secret services, the benefits of 5G are numerous. Its speed and connectivity will allow espionage systems to reach unprecedented levels of efficiency. It will also make drones more dangerous by allowing them to identify and target people using facial recognition and other methods.

Like all technology, 5G will also make us highly vulnerable. The network itself could become an attractive target for cyber-attacks and other acts of war being carried out with cutting-edge weaponry. In fact, the 5G network is already viewed as critical infrastructure and is being carefully protected before it is even fully built.

While the focus on 5G’s dangers to human health and the environment is absolutely warranted, it is also important not to lose sight of the military implications of 5G. After all, it is not just the United States that is developing this technology for military purposes; our enemies, like China and other countries, are also making great strides in this realm.

Continue Reading

Chat

Trending