Connect with us


Is Ontario’s patient ombudsman next on the Ford government chopping block?





Ontario’s health minister Christine Elliott says she takes patient care seriously but won’t say whether her former job —Ontario’s patient ombudsman — will be kept or cut by her government.

Elliott quit the high-paying job in February when she decided to run for the leadership of the Ontario Progressive Conservative party. She lost to Premier Doug Ford but won a seat in the June election and Ford tapped her to be deputy premier and health minister.

The Ford government has not appointed a new patient ombudsman to replace Elliott and the office is currently being led by its executive director Craig Thompson. There is speculation at the legislature that Ford does not intend to fill the vacancy. On the patient ombudsman website it says there are “no new job openings.”

Requests to interview Elliott about her former position and its fate were declined.

“Minister Elliott takes patient care very seriously,” a statement from press secretary Hayley Chazan said. It went on to blame the previous Liberal government for mismanaging Ontario’s health care system.

Office in limbo for months

Elliott’s office was asked repeatedly whether the Ford government is committed to keeping the position or if it is under review as part of its effort to cut costs. Her press secretary would not answer the question.

If Ford decides to scrap it, Elliott could find herself having to defend the elimination of her old job. 

“The office has been in limbo since February,” the NDP’s health critic France Gé​linas told CBC News. “The rumours circulating at Queen’s Park are that the office will be eliminated and the responsibility will go to the ombudsman.”

Premier Doug Ford and Health Minister Christine Elliott recently made a health-care investment announcement together in Grimsby, Ont. Their offices declined to comment on the fate of the patient ombudsman, a job Elliott held before getting back into politics. (Samantha Craggs/CBC)

The Ford government recently announced it intended to shut down the offices of the French Language Services commissioner and the child advocate and shift their responsibilities to the Ontario Ombudsman Paul Dubé.

Gélinas said she has not heard anything official that Ford’s government is going to take the same direction with the patient ombudsman. 

Interim Liberal Leader John Fraser said the fact that Ford hasn’t appointed a new patient ombudsman yet is a signal the PC’s are considering cutting the role.

“I would think that given the move that they’ve taken to eliminate independent officers in the Legislature, that the patient ombudsman is at risk,” he told CBC News.

Fraser said he’s concerned the office is on the chopping block and he’d like to see it maintained.

“It’s important for people who are having difficulty accessing the care they need and they don’t know where to turn. The ombudsman and the staff do that every day,” he said.

The Liberals created the position when they were in power and the office launched in 2016 with Elliott, a former PC MPP at the time, at the helm.

The office responds to complaints from current or former patients, or their caregivers, about their experiences with the health-care system. It’s meant to be a last resort if patients and their health-care providers can’t resolve problems on their own. It can also undertake investigations and make recommendations to health care organizations.

Calls for more independence

The patient ombudsman is not an independent officer of the legislature, however. It falls under Health Quality Ontario — a government agency that monitors quality in health care and provides advice to government and health care providers.

Doris Grinspun, chief executive officer of the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario, said the position never should have been put under Health Quality Ontario.

Ontario Finance Minister Vic Fedeli tables the government’s Fall Economic Statement at Queen’s Park in Toronto on November 15, 2018. Fedeli and Premier Doug Ford are looking to cut billions of dollars of spending to reduce the deficit. (Nathan Denette/Canadian Press)

“It needs to be independent,” she told CBC News. Grinspun said Ford should make the patient ombudsman an independent officer of the legislature, and if not, then fold it into the general ombudsman’s office.

But the position should not be eliminated, she said.

“The public needs to have a point of contact to speak about health system experiences and improvements we need to do. We have a lot to learn from the public and at the end of the day they are the recipients of the care,” she said.

If Ford cuts the job completely, “a voice will be lost — the voice of the public,” Grinspun said.

The public has increasingly been using the office since it opened. In its first year it received 2,000 complaints and the following year it was up to 2,300. So far this year between July and October it’s taken in 850 complaints, a higher monthly average than the year before.

With the top job vacant, the office now has 17 staff which includes early resolution specialists, investigators and other staff. The operating budget is $3.7 million. When Elliott left the job she was earning $203,543.

Laura Williams, director of patient engagement at Toronto’s University Health Network (UHN), said her office has worked with the patient ombudsman office on multiple occasions to resolve complaints by patients in UHN’s care.

Outside perspective can help patients

It can be helpful to have people outside of the hospital walls take a look at a situation and provide a “unique lens,” she said.

“It is a collaborative process and gives us another opportunity to reflect and look at things from a different perspective.”

If the government does decide to keep the role but fold it into the broader ombudsman office, it won’t get any opposition from the NDP.

Interim Liberal Leader John Fraser says the patient ombudsman is an important and effective office and should not be eliminated. (CBC)

Gélinas said the patient ombudsman’s mandate is currently too limited and moving it into the overall ombudsman office would be a way to broaden it.

She said she’s confident the ombudsman would be able to absorb the patient ombudsman duties.

The Liberals don’t share that confidence.

“The ombudsman has a pretty broad mandate; when you start to fold things in, they become diminished as a priority,” said Fraser.

Ford’s office declined the opportunity to comment for this story.


Source link

قالب وردپرس


Bill Gates: Third Shot May Be Needed to Combat Coronavirus Variants





With more than 40 million Americans having received at least the first dose of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine, a third dose may be needed to prevent the spread of new variants of the disease, Bill Gates told CBS News Tuesday.

Gates’ comments come amid growing concern that the current vaccines are not effective against the more contagious Brazilian and South African variants.

Pfizer and Moderna have stated that their vaccines are 95% and 99% effective, respectively, against the initial strain of COVID. However, some scientists have questioned those statements. Additionally, the World Health Organization and vaccine companies have conceded that the vaccines do not prevent people from being infected with COVID or from transmitting it, but are only effective at reducing symptoms.

Gates told CBS Evening News:

“The discussion now is do we just need to get a super high coverage of the current vaccine, or do we need a third dose that’s just the same, or do we need a modified vaccine?”

U.S. vaccine companies are looking at making modifications, which Gates refers to as “tuning.”

People who have had two shots may need to get a third shot and people who have not yet been vaccinated would need the modified vaccine, explained Gates. When asked whether the coronavirus vaccine would be similar to the flu vaccine, which requires yearly boosters, Gates couldn’t rule that out. Until the virus is eradicated from all humans, Gates said, additional shots may be needed in the future.

AstraZeneca in particular has a challenge with the variant,” Gates explained. “And the other two, Johnson & Johnson and Novavax, are slightly less effective, but still effective enough that we absolutely should get them out as fast as we can while we study this idea of tuning the vaccine.”

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is funding the studies being conducted in Brazil and South Africa, CBS News said. The foundation has also invested in the AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson and the Novavax vaccines, which are being tested against new variants. Once the AstraZeneca vaccine is approved, the Global Alliance for Vaccine Initiative or GAVI, founded by Gates, will distribute it globally.

“Gates continues to move the goalposts,” said Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief legal counsel of Children’s Health Defense. “Meanwhile the strategies he and others have promoted are obliterating the global economy, demolishing the middle class, making the rich richer and censoring vaccine safety advocates, like me.”

Kennedy said that the exclusive focus on vaccines has prevented the kind of progress required to actually address and recover from the pandemic:

“From the pandemic’s outset, clear-headed people familiar with the challenges inherent in the vaccine model have understood that the path out of crisis would require multiple steps. Those steps would need to include the development and/or identification of therapeutic drugs, the sharing of information among doctors to hone improved treatment models that reduce infection mortality rates below those for flu, and the kind of broad-spectrum long-term herd immunity that protects against mutant strains and that only derives from natural infection.”

Instead, Gates and vaccine makers are proposing a lifetime of boosters, supporting insufficient testing to determine safety and failing to address the inadequate monitoring of vaccine injuries, Kennedy said.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Continue Reading


Young nurse suffers from hemorrhage and brain swelling after second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine





(Natural News) A 28-year-old healthcare worker from the Swedish American Hospital, in Beloit, Wisconsin was recently admitted to the ICU just five days after receiving a second dose of Pfizer’s experimental mRNA vaccine. The previously healthy young woman was pronounced brain dead after cerebral angiography confirmed a severe hemorrhage stroke in her brain stem.

Her family members confirmed that she was “breaking out in rashes” after the vaccine. She also suffered from sudden migraine headaches, and got “sick” after taking the second dose of the vaccine. At the very end, she lost the ability to speak and went unconscious. The migraines, nausea, and loss of speech were all symptoms of a brain bleed and brain swelling, something her family did not understand at the time, and something nobody would expect after vaccination.

While on life support, neurologists used angiography to image the damage inside the brain. They found a subarachnoid hemorrhage, whereas a bulging blood vessel burst in the brain, bleeding out in the space between the brain and the tissue covering the brain. The ensuing swelling cut off oxygen to the brain and caused brain death. On February 10, 2021, Sarah reportedly had “no brain activity.” Some of the woman’s organs are now being procured, so they can be donated to other people around the world.

Doctors warn FDA about COVID vaccines causing autoimmune attacks in the heart and brain

Experimental COVID-19 vaccines may cause inflammation along the cardiovascular system, leading to heart attack and/or stroke. This serious issue was brought forth to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by Dr. J. Patrick Whelan, M.D., Ph.D. and further confirmed by cardiothoracic surgeon, Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, M.D., Ph.D. The two doctors warned that a recently-infected patient who is subject to COVID-19 vaccination is likely to suffer from autoimmune attacks along the ACE-2 receptors present in the heart, and in the microvasculature of the brain, liver and kidney. If viral antigens are present in the tissues of recipients at the time of vaccination, the vaccine-augmented immune response will turn the immune system against those tissues, causing inflammation that can lead to blood clot formation.

This severe adverse event is likely cause of death for the elderly who are vaccinated despite recently being infected. There is no adequate screening process to ensure that this autoimmune attack doesn’t occur. The elderly are not the only people vulnerable to vaccine injury and death. Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine could be the main cause behind the sudden death of Sarah Sickles, a 28-year-old nurse from Wisconsin. The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System has captured five permanent disabilities in Wisconsin, 58 ER visits, and eleven deaths in just one month. This is the first case in Wisconsin of someone under 44 years of age suffering from severe COVID-19 vaccine side effects and death. There are now more than 1,170 deaths recorded in the U.S. related to the experimental mRNA vaccines, a reality that the FDA and CDC continue to ignore.

Continue Reading


Powering hypersonic weapons: US armed forces eyeing dangerous 5G tech





(Natural News) Much of the conversation surrounding the benefits of 5G is geared toward the consumer side of the technology. People will be able to download videos at lightning speed and will be more connected than ever, proponents claim, although there are serious questions regarding its safety. However, some of the most important 5G applications are not civil at all – the technology will be used extensively in the military domain.

Some of its military uses are outlined in the Defense Applications of 5G Network Technology report, which was published by the Defense Science Board. This federal committee gives scientific advice to the Pentagon. Their report states: “The emergence of 5G technology, now commercially available, offers the Department of Defense the opportunity to take advantage, at minimal cost, of the benefits of this system for its own operational requirements.”

The 5G commercial network that is being built by private companies right now can be used by the American military for a much lower cost than if the network had been set up exclusively for military purposes.

Military experts expect the 5G system to play a pivotal role in using hypersonic weapons. For example, it can be used for new missiles that bear nuclear warheads and travel at speeds superior to Mach 5. These hypersonic weapons, which travel at five times the speed of sound and move a mile per second, will be flying at high altitudes on unpredictable flight paths, making them as hard to guide as they will be to intercept.

Huge quantities of data need to be gathered and transmitted in a very short period in order to maneuver these warheads on variable trajectories and allow them to change direction in milliseconds to avoid interceptor missiles.

5G for defense

This type of technology is also needed to activate defenses should we be attacked by a weapon of this type; 5G automatic systems could theoretically handle decisions that humans won’t have enough time to make on their own. Military bases and even cities will have less than a minute to react to incoming hypersonic missiles, and 5G will make it easier to process real time data on trajectories for decision-making.

There are also important uses of this technology in combat. 5G’s ability to simultaneously link millions of transceivers will undoubtedly facilitate communication among military personnel and allow them to transmit photos, maps and other vital information about operations in progress at dizzying speeds to improve situational awareness.

The military can also take advantage of the high-frequency and short-wavelength millimeter wave spectrum used by 5G. Its short range means that it is well suited for smart military bases and command posts because the signal will not propagate too far, making it less likely that enemies will be able to detect it.

When it comes to special forces and secret services, the benefits of 5G are numerous. Its speed and connectivity will allow espionage systems to reach unprecedented levels of efficiency. It will also make drones more dangerous by allowing them to identify and target people using facial recognition and other methods.

Like all technology, 5G will also make us highly vulnerable. The network itself could become an attractive target for cyber-attacks and other acts of war being carried out with cutting-edge weaponry. In fact, the 5G network is already viewed as critical infrastructure and is being carefully protected before it is even fully built.

While the focus on 5G’s dangers to human health and the environment is absolutely warranted, it is also important not to lose sight of the military implications of 5G. After all, it is not just the United States that is developing this technology for military purposes; our enemies, like China and other countries, are also making great strides in this realm.

Continue Reading