Connect with us


31 days of fitness? Never again, says the writer who tried it





SEATTLE—It began as an office health initiative — “The 31-Day Wellness Challenge” tasked participants with exercising for 30 minutes daily for a month, with extra points for trying new activities. I had planned to participate quietly on my own, but after an ill-advised glass of wine (or three), I posted about the fitness challenge on Instagram. That did it. Now I was locked in by social-media accountability (the worst kind).

The world probably does not need another “I ate nothing but activated charcoal for a month and became a mermaid” story about the latest fitness craze. And I didn’t plan on writing one. But after working out for 31 days straight, I did learn something: It’s terrible.

Mindy Kaling’s sitcom, The Mindy Project, provided inspiration for the writer, who would climb 102 floors on the StairMaster in honour of Kaling climbing to the top of the Empire State Building in her show.
Mindy Kaling’s sitcom, The Mindy Project, provided inspiration for the writer, who would climb 102 floors on the StairMaster in honour of Kaling climbing to the top of the Empire State Building in her show.  (HANDOUT / TNS)

It starts out feeling great, then it’s terrible, then great again, then completely unbearable. Just before day 31, you devolve into a sweaty fevered monster oozing self-congratulatory “inspirational” fitness advice for all the lesser beings who didn’t recently jump rope and row-machine themselves into minorly-muscled gym rats eager to post a muscle emoji on any slightly fitness-related social-media message.

When I started, I had already been working out pretty regularly, probably five days a week (or three), so what was two more? Besides, I was pretty sure I’d magically transform body and soul into Beyoncé by the end of the month, because that’s what happens when you do one of these kitschy “31 days of something kind of unpleasant/inconvenient” things, right?

As the Instagram likes accumulated, friends claiming inspiration decided to join the challenge, and by Day 3 I was certain I would blast through the month like I was in a montage set to Natalie Imbruglia’s “Torn.” But by Day 4, the inspired friends had tapped out, and I was lying cold and shamed on the floor of my apartment attempting a half-hearted home workout.

That’s when I realized the only way I was going to make it through the next 27 days was if I made things more interesting. So on Day 5 I went kayaking for the first time. On Day 6 I beat down my anti-social tendencies and signed up for a group boxing class, where I quickly discovered that hitting things was my lifelong calling.

Over the next two weeks I boxed, lifted weights and ran new routes around my neighbourhood. I invented games at the gym like a mini “triathlon” —10-minute intervals on the treadmill, row machine and stationary bike —or what I dubbed “The Mindy Challenge” —climbing 102 floors on the StairMaster in honour of The Mindy Project heroine climbing 102 floors to the top of the Empire State Building. My partner still comes home from the gym sometimes bragging about “beasting The Mindy Challenge.”

By Day 18 I was sore, stiff and mentally exhausted. I felt like I was on some kind of special exercise-based, obstacle-riddled journey, but there were few actual obstacles in my 31-day exercise routine. With no kids and few responsibilities outside of work, I could prioritize fitness. I had the money for a gym membership, group classes, kayak rentals and replacing worn workout gear. I do struggle with asthma, but I have the physical ability to try many different types of workouts.

And I still had several days where I just couldn’t find the energy to get myself to the gym.

Privilege plays no small part in one’s ability to successfully complete challenges like this one.

Of course, that doesn’t mean one shouldn’t try to establish sustainable health and fitness habits. But it’s important to acknowledge that we each face different obstacles to exercise, and there isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution. No juice cleanse or month-long challenge will magically transform everyone into an Instagram fitness star, and it can be dangerous to think otherwise.

Something I did gain from the challenge was insight into what does work for me. I already knew that it was easier for me to wake up early and hit the gym before work than it was to conjure the energy after a full day at the office, but the challenge affirmed this. I already knew that I get bored easily and need to change up my routine often, but taking boxing made me want to budget for the occasional group class. I learned that I need to take some days off not just to recover physically but to give myself a mental reprieve from pushing and judging myself if I’m not meeting certain goals.

A friend struggling with mental illness started the challenge with me but did not complete it; she found she needed to prioritize her mental health. For her, fitness could be a part of working on her mental health, but 31 days focused only on physical fitness would have actually been detrimental to her overall well-being.

Another friend reported that 10 minutes of dancing alone in her bedroom was the only thing she was up for every day. She had to abandon some assumptions about what constitutes a “proper workout” to find something that she could do viably and joyfully over an entire month.

The best regimen for health is one you can sustain. And what works will likely change throughout your life. What works for one person won’t necessarily work for another, and working out for 31 days straight likely won’t transform most of us into forever-changed self-help gurus claiming the secret to a perfect body and permanent happiness (or claiming that those might be the same thing).

On Day 32, I stayed in my pyjamas all day, drinking wine and reading, something I hadn’t had much time for during the challenge. And it was glorious! In the end, the challenge became a quirky, sometimes fun, sometimes exhausting thing I did once, not a permanent solution to any particular fitness issues.

Months later, I still work out as regularly as I did before the challenge, probably five days a week (or three), but I do have some new ways of staying engaged when all I have time for is 30 minutes at the gym. For that, I have The Mindy Project to thank more than anything.


Source link

قالب وردپرس

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Bill Gates: Third Shot May Be Needed to Combat Coronavirus Variants





With more than 40 million Americans having received at least the first dose of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine, a third dose may be needed to prevent the spread of new variants of the disease, Bill Gates told CBS News Tuesday.

Gates’ comments come amid growing concern that the current vaccines are not effective against the more contagious Brazilian and South African variants.

Pfizer and Moderna have stated that their vaccines are 95% and 99% effective, respectively, against the initial strain of COVID. However, some scientists have questioned those statements. Additionally, the World Health Organization and vaccine companies have conceded that the vaccines do not prevent people from being infected with COVID or from transmitting it, but are only effective at reducing symptoms.

Gates told CBS Evening News:

“The discussion now is do we just need to get a super high coverage of the current vaccine, or do we need a third dose that’s just the same, or do we need a modified vaccine?”

U.S. vaccine companies are looking at making modifications, which Gates refers to as “tuning.”

People who have had two shots may need to get a third shot and people who have not yet been vaccinated would need the modified vaccine, explained Gates. When asked whether the coronavirus vaccine would be similar to the flu vaccine, which requires yearly boosters, Gates couldn’t rule that out. Until the virus is eradicated from all humans, Gates said, additional shots may be needed in the future.

AstraZeneca in particular has a challenge with the variant,” Gates explained. “And the other two, Johnson & Johnson and Novavax, are slightly less effective, but still effective enough that we absolutely should get them out as fast as we can while we study this idea of tuning the vaccine.”

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is funding the studies being conducted in Brazil and South Africa, CBS News said. The foundation has also invested in the AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson and the Novavax vaccines, which are being tested against new variants. Once the AstraZeneca vaccine is approved, the Global Alliance for Vaccine Initiative or GAVI, founded by Gates, will distribute it globally.

“Gates continues to move the goalposts,” said Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief legal counsel of Children’s Health Defense. “Meanwhile the strategies he and others have promoted are obliterating the global economy, demolishing the middle class, making the rich richer and censoring vaccine safety advocates, like me.”

Kennedy said that the exclusive focus on vaccines has prevented the kind of progress required to actually address and recover from the pandemic:

“From the pandemic’s outset, clear-headed people familiar with the challenges inherent in the vaccine model have understood that the path out of crisis would require multiple steps. Those steps would need to include the development and/or identification of therapeutic drugs, the sharing of information among doctors to hone improved treatment models that reduce infection mortality rates below those for flu, and the kind of broad-spectrum long-term herd immunity that protects against mutant strains and that only derives from natural infection.”

Instead, Gates and vaccine makers are proposing a lifetime of boosters, supporting insufficient testing to determine safety and failing to address the inadequate monitoring of vaccine injuries, Kennedy said.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Continue Reading


Young nurse suffers from hemorrhage and brain swelling after second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine





(Natural News) A 28-year-old healthcare worker from the Swedish American Hospital, in Beloit, Wisconsin was recently admitted to the ICU just five days after receiving a second dose of Pfizer’s experimental mRNA vaccine. The previously healthy young woman was pronounced brain dead after cerebral angiography confirmed a severe hemorrhage stroke in her brain stem.

Her family members confirmed that she was “breaking out in rashes” after the vaccine. She also suffered from sudden migraine headaches, and got “sick” after taking the second dose of the vaccine. At the very end, she lost the ability to speak and went unconscious. The migraines, nausea, and loss of speech were all symptoms of a brain bleed and brain swelling, something her family did not understand at the time, and something nobody would expect after vaccination.

While on life support, neurologists used angiography to image the damage inside the brain. They found a subarachnoid hemorrhage, whereas a bulging blood vessel burst in the brain, bleeding out in the space between the brain and the tissue covering the brain. The ensuing swelling cut off oxygen to the brain and caused brain death. On February 10, 2021, Sarah reportedly had “no brain activity.” Some of the woman’s organs are now being procured, so they can be donated to other people around the world.

Doctors warn FDA about COVID vaccines causing autoimmune attacks in the heart and brain

Experimental COVID-19 vaccines may cause inflammation along the cardiovascular system, leading to heart attack and/or stroke. This serious issue was brought forth to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by Dr. J. Patrick Whelan, M.D., Ph.D. and further confirmed by cardiothoracic surgeon, Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, M.D., Ph.D. The two doctors warned that a recently-infected patient who is subject to COVID-19 vaccination is likely to suffer from autoimmune attacks along the ACE-2 receptors present in the heart, and in the microvasculature of the brain, liver and kidney. If viral antigens are present in the tissues of recipients at the time of vaccination, the vaccine-augmented immune response will turn the immune system against those tissues, causing inflammation that can lead to blood clot formation.

This severe adverse event is likely cause of death for the elderly who are vaccinated despite recently being infected. There is no adequate screening process to ensure that this autoimmune attack doesn’t occur. The elderly are not the only people vulnerable to vaccine injury and death. Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine could be the main cause behind the sudden death of Sarah Sickles, a 28-year-old nurse from Wisconsin. The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System has captured five permanent disabilities in Wisconsin, 58 ER visits, and eleven deaths in just one month. This is the first case in Wisconsin of someone under 44 years of age suffering from severe COVID-19 vaccine side effects and death. There are now more than 1,170 deaths recorded in the U.S. related to the experimental mRNA vaccines, a reality that the FDA and CDC continue to ignore.

Continue Reading


Powering hypersonic weapons: US armed forces eyeing dangerous 5G tech





(Natural News) Much of the conversation surrounding the benefits of 5G is geared toward the consumer side of the technology. People will be able to download videos at lightning speed and will be more connected than ever, proponents claim, although there are serious questions regarding its safety. However, some of the most important 5G applications are not civil at all – the technology will be used extensively in the military domain.

Some of its military uses are outlined in the Defense Applications of 5G Network Technology report, which was published by the Defense Science Board. This federal committee gives scientific advice to the Pentagon. Their report states: “The emergence of 5G technology, now commercially available, offers the Department of Defense the opportunity to take advantage, at minimal cost, of the benefits of this system for its own operational requirements.”

The 5G commercial network that is being built by private companies right now can be used by the American military for a much lower cost than if the network had been set up exclusively for military purposes.

Military experts expect the 5G system to play a pivotal role in using hypersonic weapons. For example, it can be used for new missiles that bear nuclear warheads and travel at speeds superior to Mach 5. These hypersonic weapons, which travel at five times the speed of sound and move a mile per second, will be flying at high altitudes on unpredictable flight paths, making them as hard to guide as they will be to intercept.

Huge quantities of data need to be gathered and transmitted in a very short period in order to maneuver these warheads on variable trajectories and allow them to change direction in milliseconds to avoid interceptor missiles.

5G for defense

This type of technology is also needed to activate defenses should we be attacked by a weapon of this type; 5G automatic systems could theoretically handle decisions that humans won’t have enough time to make on their own. Military bases and even cities will have less than a minute to react to incoming hypersonic missiles, and 5G will make it easier to process real time data on trajectories for decision-making.

There are also important uses of this technology in combat. 5G’s ability to simultaneously link millions of transceivers will undoubtedly facilitate communication among military personnel and allow them to transmit photos, maps and other vital information about operations in progress at dizzying speeds to improve situational awareness.

The military can also take advantage of the high-frequency and short-wavelength millimeter wave spectrum used by 5G. Its short range means that it is well suited for smart military bases and command posts because the signal will not propagate too far, making it less likely that enemies will be able to detect it.

When it comes to special forces and secret services, the benefits of 5G are numerous. Its speed and connectivity will allow espionage systems to reach unprecedented levels of efficiency. It will also make drones more dangerous by allowing them to identify and target people using facial recognition and other methods.

Like all technology, 5G will also make us highly vulnerable. The network itself could become an attractive target for cyber-attacks and other acts of war being carried out with cutting-edge weaponry. In fact, the 5G network is already viewed as critical infrastructure and is being carefully protected before it is even fully built.

While the focus on 5G’s dangers to human health and the environment is absolutely warranted, it is also important not to lose sight of the military implications of 5G. After all, it is not just the United States that is developing this technology for military purposes; our enemies, like China and other countries, are also making great strides in this realm.

Continue Reading