Connect with us


Tips for drivers with diabetes





What should you do before driving?

If you have diabetes and are being treated with insulin or certain medications (glyburide, gliclazide, glimepiride or repaglinide), the answer is ‘always test your blood sugar.’

If think you may have low blood sugar and you’re driving, pull over to safety and bring your blood sugar back to normal levels.
If think you may have low blood sugar and you’re driving, pull over to safety and bring your blood sugar back to normal levels.  (Carlos Osorio / Toronto Star)

Driving with low blood sugar (also known as hypoglycemia) can have dangerous and sometimes even fatal consequences.

Hypoglycemia can lead to a variety of warning symptoms. Early signs include sweating, shakiness, hunger, dizziness, and heart palpitations. If your blood sugar is extremely low you can develop confusion, inability to concentrate or even loss of consciousness. Severely low blood sugar impairs your ability to think and safely operate a motor vehicle — putting you at an increased risk of getting into a collision.

If you’re in a collision when you’ve been behind the wheel with low blood sugar, you may be charged with a criminal offence such as dangerous operation of a motor vehicle or criminal negligence causing death. And if the courts decide you haven’t taken adequate precautions to prevent hypoglycemia, you can be convicted and even sentenced to prison. Few people know of these potentially grave consequences.

When your blood sugar is low (less than 4 mmol/l), you need to eat or drink quick-acting carbohydrates like juice, regular (not diet) pop, dextrose tablets or Lifesavers candies then wait at least 40 minutes and recheck your blood sugar to see if your blood sugar has returned to a safe level (above 5 mmol/l) before you drive.

If you’re ever driving and think you might have low blood sugar, immediately pull over to a safe place at the side of the road. Never, ever continue driving if you have even the remotest inkling you’re blood sugar is low.

Always keep your blood glucose meter and quick-acting carbohydrates with you when you’re driving. Also, if you’re going to be driving for more than four hours, periodically find a place to safely pull over and check your blood sugar.

Unfortunately, many people have never been specifically told these things — or were told and forgot. Or, sometimes, they’ve chosen to ignore it.

It’s crucial people with diabetes who may experience hypoglycemia be aware of the key driving information in the Diabetes Canada 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines. This document provides essential recommendations to keep people living with diabetes safe while driving.

If you’re prone to severe hypoglycemia — when another person is needed to help you treat it — your doctor, depending on where you live in Canada, may be obligated to notify the local licensing authority, which may suspend your license until you’re considered safe to drive.

Education is the first step in preventing hypoglycemia-related collisions. Physicians, diabetes nurse educators, dietitians and other diabetes health care providers need to inform drivers living with diabetes how to responsibly manage their diabetes to avoid hypoglycemia when they’re behind the wheel.

Patients who drive have a duty to follow this advice.

The risk of having a collision when you have low blood sugar is especially high if you don’t know when you’re low.

Many people who’ve had diabetes for many years, or who’ve had frequent episodes of hypoglycemia, develop hypoglycemia unawareness, in which the early symptoms of low blood sugar aren’t felt. This is dangerous because your first indication of low blood sugar may be when your ability to think clearly — and drive safely — is impaired.

Hypoglycemia unawareness isn’t necessarily constant. There may be times when you readily recognize symptoms when your blood sugar is “low” but other times when the first clue you’re low is when others notice you to be confused or disoriented.

If you’re known to experience hypoglycemia unawareness we strongly recommend you use a real-time continuous glucose monitor system. This is a device that automatically and continuously measures your glucose level and displays the results on your cellphone, watch, or other display. It also has alarms to prompt you to deal with impending low blood sugar before it gets out of control.

But it’s not only health care providers and people living with diabetes who need to be better informed about issues surrounding diabetes and driving. Recently, we were part of a team that published an article in the Canadian Journal of Diabetes that advocated for action not only by medical professionals and people living with diabetes, but also by legal professionals and legislators. We believe many members of the legal community don’t sufficiently understand diabetes and, in particular, don’t fully grasp that people experiencing an episode of hypoglycemia unawareness don’t know it’s happening and therefore don’t know that they need to immediately treat it.

Should a person who’s taken appropriate preventive measures and still has an episode of hypoglycemia unawareness be considered truly responsible for their actions when they have an episode of low blood sugar? We think not, and recommend the legal community contemplate this and how they deal with such circumstances.

Dr. Gary Lewis is a professor in the Departments of Medicine and Physiology and the Director of the Banting and Best Diabetes Centre at the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Medicine. He is also the Drucker Family Chair in Diabetes Research and Sun Life Financial Chair in Diabetes. Dr. Ian Blumer is a lecturer in the Department of Medicine’s Division of General Internal Medicine and a member of the Banting and Best Diabetes Centre. He is also a member of the board of directors and medical adviser to the Charles H. Best Diabetes Centre. Doctors’ Notes is a weekly column by members of the U of T Faculty of Medicine.


Source link

قالب وردپرس


Bill Gates: Third Shot May Be Needed to Combat Coronavirus Variants





With more than 40 million Americans having received at least the first dose of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine, a third dose may be needed to prevent the spread of new variants of the disease, Bill Gates told CBS News Tuesday.

Gates’ comments come amid growing concern that the current vaccines are not effective against the more contagious Brazilian and South African variants.

Pfizer and Moderna have stated that their vaccines are 95% and 99% effective, respectively, against the initial strain of COVID. However, some scientists have questioned those statements. Additionally, the World Health Organization and vaccine companies have conceded that the vaccines do not prevent people from being infected with COVID or from transmitting it, but are only effective at reducing symptoms.

Gates told CBS Evening News:

“The discussion now is do we just need to get a super high coverage of the current vaccine, or do we need a third dose that’s just the same, or do we need a modified vaccine?”

U.S. vaccine companies are looking at making modifications, which Gates refers to as “tuning.”

People who have had two shots may need to get a third shot and people who have not yet been vaccinated would need the modified vaccine, explained Gates. When asked whether the coronavirus vaccine would be similar to the flu vaccine, which requires yearly boosters, Gates couldn’t rule that out. Until the virus is eradicated from all humans, Gates said, additional shots may be needed in the future.

AstraZeneca in particular has a challenge with the variant,” Gates explained. “And the other two, Johnson & Johnson and Novavax, are slightly less effective, but still effective enough that we absolutely should get them out as fast as we can while we study this idea of tuning the vaccine.”

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is funding the studies being conducted in Brazil and South Africa, CBS News said. The foundation has also invested in the AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson and the Novavax vaccines, which are being tested against new variants. Once the AstraZeneca vaccine is approved, the Global Alliance for Vaccine Initiative or GAVI, founded by Gates, will distribute it globally.

“Gates continues to move the goalposts,” said Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief legal counsel of Children’s Health Defense. “Meanwhile the strategies he and others have promoted are obliterating the global economy, demolishing the middle class, making the rich richer and censoring vaccine safety advocates, like me.”

Kennedy said that the exclusive focus on vaccines has prevented the kind of progress required to actually address and recover from the pandemic:

“From the pandemic’s outset, clear-headed people familiar with the challenges inherent in the vaccine model have understood that the path out of crisis would require multiple steps. Those steps would need to include the development and/or identification of therapeutic drugs, the sharing of information among doctors to hone improved treatment models that reduce infection mortality rates below those for flu, and the kind of broad-spectrum long-term herd immunity that protects against mutant strains and that only derives from natural infection.”

Instead, Gates and vaccine makers are proposing a lifetime of boosters, supporting insufficient testing to determine safety and failing to address the inadequate monitoring of vaccine injuries, Kennedy said.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Continue Reading


Young nurse suffers from hemorrhage and brain swelling after second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine





(Natural News) A 28-year-old healthcare worker from the Swedish American Hospital, in Beloit, Wisconsin was recently admitted to the ICU just five days after receiving a second dose of Pfizer’s experimental mRNA vaccine. The previously healthy young woman was pronounced brain dead after cerebral angiography confirmed a severe hemorrhage stroke in her brain stem.

Her family members confirmed that she was “breaking out in rashes” after the vaccine. She also suffered from sudden migraine headaches, and got “sick” after taking the second dose of the vaccine. At the very end, she lost the ability to speak and went unconscious. The migraines, nausea, and loss of speech were all symptoms of a brain bleed and brain swelling, something her family did not understand at the time, and something nobody would expect after vaccination.

While on life support, neurologists used angiography to image the damage inside the brain. They found a subarachnoid hemorrhage, whereas a bulging blood vessel burst in the brain, bleeding out in the space between the brain and the tissue covering the brain. The ensuing swelling cut off oxygen to the brain and caused brain death. On February 10, 2021, Sarah reportedly had “no brain activity.” Some of the woman’s organs are now being procured, so they can be donated to other people around the world.

Doctors warn FDA about COVID vaccines causing autoimmune attacks in the heart and brain

Experimental COVID-19 vaccines may cause inflammation along the cardiovascular system, leading to heart attack and/or stroke. This serious issue was brought forth to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by Dr. J. Patrick Whelan, M.D., Ph.D. and further confirmed by cardiothoracic surgeon, Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, M.D., Ph.D. The two doctors warned that a recently-infected patient who is subject to COVID-19 vaccination is likely to suffer from autoimmune attacks along the ACE-2 receptors present in the heart, and in the microvasculature of the brain, liver and kidney. If viral antigens are present in the tissues of recipients at the time of vaccination, the vaccine-augmented immune response will turn the immune system against those tissues, causing inflammation that can lead to blood clot formation.

This severe adverse event is likely cause of death for the elderly who are vaccinated despite recently being infected. There is no adequate screening process to ensure that this autoimmune attack doesn’t occur. The elderly are not the only people vulnerable to vaccine injury and death. Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine could be the main cause behind the sudden death of Sarah Sickles, a 28-year-old nurse from Wisconsin. The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System has captured five permanent disabilities in Wisconsin, 58 ER visits, and eleven deaths in just one month. This is the first case in Wisconsin of someone under 44 years of age suffering from severe COVID-19 vaccine side effects and death. There are now more than 1,170 deaths recorded in the U.S. related to the experimental mRNA vaccines, a reality that the FDA and CDC continue to ignore.

Continue Reading


Powering hypersonic weapons: US armed forces eyeing dangerous 5G tech





(Natural News) Much of the conversation surrounding the benefits of 5G is geared toward the consumer side of the technology. People will be able to download videos at lightning speed and will be more connected than ever, proponents claim, although there are serious questions regarding its safety. However, some of the most important 5G applications are not civil at all – the technology will be used extensively in the military domain.

Some of its military uses are outlined in the Defense Applications of 5G Network Technology report, which was published by the Defense Science Board. This federal committee gives scientific advice to the Pentagon. Their report states: “The emergence of 5G technology, now commercially available, offers the Department of Defense the opportunity to take advantage, at minimal cost, of the benefits of this system for its own operational requirements.”

The 5G commercial network that is being built by private companies right now can be used by the American military for a much lower cost than if the network had been set up exclusively for military purposes.

Military experts expect the 5G system to play a pivotal role in using hypersonic weapons. For example, it can be used for new missiles that bear nuclear warheads and travel at speeds superior to Mach 5. These hypersonic weapons, which travel at five times the speed of sound and move a mile per second, will be flying at high altitudes on unpredictable flight paths, making them as hard to guide as they will be to intercept.

Huge quantities of data need to be gathered and transmitted in a very short period in order to maneuver these warheads on variable trajectories and allow them to change direction in milliseconds to avoid interceptor missiles.

5G for defense

This type of technology is also needed to activate defenses should we be attacked by a weapon of this type; 5G automatic systems could theoretically handle decisions that humans won’t have enough time to make on their own. Military bases and even cities will have less than a minute to react to incoming hypersonic missiles, and 5G will make it easier to process real time data on trajectories for decision-making.

There are also important uses of this technology in combat. 5G’s ability to simultaneously link millions of transceivers will undoubtedly facilitate communication among military personnel and allow them to transmit photos, maps and other vital information about operations in progress at dizzying speeds to improve situational awareness.

The military can also take advantage of the high-frequency and short-wavelength millimeter wave spectrum used by 5G. Its short range means that it is well suited for smart military bases and command posts because the signal will not propagate too far, making it less likely that enemies will be able to detect it.

When it comes to special forces and secret services, the benefits of 5G are numerous. Its speed and connectivity will allow espionage systems to reach unprecedented levels of efficiency. It will also make drones more dangerous by allowing them to identify and target people using facial recognition and other methods.

Like all technology, 5G will also make us highly vulnerable. The network itself could become an attractive target for cyber-attacks and other acts of war being carried out with cutting-edge weaponry. In fact, the 5G network is already viewed as critical infrastructure and is being carefully protected before it is even fully built.

While the focus on 5G’s dangers to human health and the environment is absolutely warranted, it is also important not to lose sight of the military implications of 5G. After all, it is not just the United States that is developing this technology for military purposes; our enemies, like China and other countries, are also making great strides in this realm.

Continue Reading